Social Economy: Civil Guard contribution through his intellectual capital
Keywords:
Social Economy, Intellectual Capital, Civil Guard, 2030Abstract
The concept of social economy is promoted in Europe and consolidated in Spain thanks to the International Research and Information Center on Public, Social and Cooperative Economy. If we relate these terms: public, social, cooperativism and public economy it leads us to think of an organization that has aligned them in its strategy for more than 180 years of existence: the Institutional Corps of the Civil Guard, by converging economic and social practices in the provision of goods and services. However, no research, articles or projects have been found that address this. We propose to analyze the extent to which their solidarity and humanitarian actions generate economic-social value through the dimensions that make up their Intellectual Capital (IC). The methodology used is based on the content analysis of the information disclosed in your IC. It is a longitudinal analysis that covers the period 2014-2023, using the Intellectus model with wide national and international impact. The results show that their actions are aimed at both the security and protection of citizens, are socially responsible, and protect the environment and biodiversity. We opened a line of research on security bodies and sustainability, since the commitment to the 2030 Agenda begins by focusing on people and society as an asset of sustainable innovation. We can say that the mission of the Civil Guard is not based only on security but also on economic and social growth through the dynamism of the IC dimensions.
Downloads
References
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2001). How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. Academy Of Management Perspectives, 15(1), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.4251563
Alvarado, D. J. F., Mitma, G. D. G., Vera, T. L. D., & Tarrillo, J. J. C. (2022). Capital intelectual como factor del desempeño organizacional en las Micro y Pequeñas Empresas. Revista de Investigación En Comunicación y Desarrollo, 13(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.33595/2226-1478.13.1.595
Briñez R. M. E. (2021). Tecnología de información: ¿Herramienta potenciadora para gestionar el capital intelectual? Revista de Ciencias Sociales 27(1), 180-192. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i1.35305
Burt, R. S. (2004). Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. https://acortar.link/1rSlTr
Carini, Ch.,Galera, G.,Tallarini, G., Chaves, A., Sak, B. & Schoenmaeckers, J., (2024). Benchmarking the socio-economic performance of the EU Social Economy. European Commission. https://acortar.link/dPs5Ql
Codina, L., Morales-Vargas, A., Rodríguez-Martínez, R. & Pérez-Montoro, M. (2020). Uso de Scopus y Web of Science para investigar y evaluar en comunicación social. Análisis comparativo y caracterización. Index.ComunicacióN/Index Comunicación, 10(3), In 235-261. https://doi.org/10.33732/ixc/10/03usodes.
Díaz B. F. y Lejarriaga Pérez de las Vacas G. (2019). Presentacion del monográfico: Emprendimiento social y empleabilidad. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 129, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.5209/REVE.62962
Diaz-Foncea M., Marcuello S. & Monreal G. (2016). Economía social y economía colaborativa: Encaje y potencialidades. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología. Revista: Economía Industrial (EI)ISSN 0422-2784, Nº 402, 2016.
Díaz F. M., Marcuello S. C. & Monreal G. M. (2006). Economía Industrial. Nº 402, Pág. 27-35.
García-Flores, V., & Martos, L. P. (2019). Innovación social: Factores claves para su desarrollo en los territorios. CIRIEC-España Revista de Economía Pública Social y Cooperativa, 97, 245-278. https://doi.org/10.7203/ciriec-e.97.14148
García-Flores, V., & Martos, L. P. (2020). Entidades del tercer sector e innovación social. Elementos caracterizadores y factores de éxito. REVESCO Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 136, e71861. https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.71861
García-Porras, B., (2025). Presentación del informe estadístico CIRIEC, Euricse y Spatial Foresight “Evaluación comparativa de los resultados socioeconómicos de la Economía Social de la UE”.
González, J. M., Lara, J. , Cuadrado, S. S., & Barquín, B. A. R. (2006). Categorización de los conceptos en el análisis de contenido: su señalamiento desde la Retórica clásica hasta los Topic Maps. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory Of Open Access Journals). https://acortar.link/ysTsrG
Hazan, E., Smit, S., Woetzel J., Cvetanovski, B., Krishnan, M., Gregg, B., Perrey J. & Hjartar, K. (2021).Getting tangible about intangible. The future of grow and productivity? Mckinsey Global Institute. https://acortar.link/HWSFzs
Jeffrey, S., Rosenberg, S. and McCabe, B. (2019). Corporate social responsibility behaviors and corporate reputation. Social Responsibility Journal, Vol.15 No.3, pp. 395-408. https://acortar.link/Dw5uUb
Lejarriaga, P., Bel, D.,Martín, L., Sánchez, E., (2018). Educación y Formación en emprendimiento Social: Características y Creación de Valor Social Sostenible en Proyectos de Emprendimiento Social. XVII Congreso Internacional de Investigadores en Economía Social y Colaborativa.
Maqbool, S., Rasool, H., & Ahmad, S. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Indian Banks. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3743755
Moreno, C. M., Ramos, M. A., Aure, N. G., & Landaeta, R. P. (2018). Gestión del conocimiento en organizaciones del sector nuclear.
Ministerio del Interior (2025/30/01). Memoria de Sostenibilidad Guardia Civil. 2023. Accesible en https://acortar.link/NBrxPC
Ministerio de la Presidencia y Justicia con las Cortes, (CEPAGE). (2024/20/12). Memoria de Sostenibilidad Guardia Civil. 2022. https://acortar.link/1PfEcs
Ministerio Trabajo y Economía Social. Informe de evolución y Tendencias en el ámbito de la Economía Social (2023). Confederación Empresarial Española de la Economía Social (CEPES). https://acortar.link/l55ru5
Moreiro, G., Morato, L., Sánchez, C. & Rodríguez, B., (2006). Categorización de los conceptos en el análisis de contenido: su señalamiento desde la Retórica clásica hasta los Topic Maps. Investig. bibl [online]. 2006, vol.20, n.40, pp.13-31. ISSN 2448-8321.
Pedreño, J., (2024). The social economy & The EU 2024-2029 Objectives. Europe Social Economy. https://www.socialeconomy.eu.org/
Sánchez Espada J., Martín López S., Bel Durán P. y Lejarriaga Pérez de las Vacas G. (2018). Educación y formación en emprendimiento social: características y creación de valor social sostenible en proyectos de emprendimiento social. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 129, 16-38. https://doi.org/10.5209/REVE.62492
Secundo, G., Ndou, V., Del Vecchio, P., & De Pascale, G. (2020). Sustainable development, intellectual capital and technology policies: A structured literature review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 153, 119917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119917
Stratone, M. (2023). A Bibliometric Analysis of the Role of the Intellectual Capital in the Organizational Agility and Performance. Proceedings Of The . International Conference On Business Excellence, 17(1), 1275-1285. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-011
Sumedrea, S. (2013). Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance: A Dynamic Relationship in Crisis Time. Procedia Economics And Finance, 6, 137-144. https://acortar.link/3EPXir
Thum-Thysen, A., Voigt, P., & Weiss, C., (2021). Refections on Complementarities in Capital Formation & Production: Tangible & Intangible Assets across Europe.Euopean Commission/EuropeanEconomy[online]ISSN 2443-8022.https://acortar.link/yQGHYW
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Virginia Subiris Moriel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
